<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ITalkInType &#187; WeWatchOnTelevision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://italkintype.co.uk/tag/tv-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://italkintype.co.uk</link>
	<description>Communicate electronically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WeWatchInMotion &#8211; Flashforward</title>
		<link>http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/10/15/wewatchinmotion-flashforward/</link>
		<comments>http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/10/15/wewatchinmotion-flashforward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WeWatchOnTelevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flashforward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack davenport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joseph fiennes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonja wager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://italkintype.co.uk/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>


The cast of &#8216;Flashforward&#8217; (Image: ABC)


It’s the next Lost! It’s Lost but different – so if you like it’ll you’ll love it. It’s got Charlie in it! It has Penny in it! Mystery! Sci-Fi! A big catastrophe at the start! Lost! Lost! Lost! Lost!
&#8230;Yes, I’m pretty sure that the general gist of Flashforward is that it’s touted out to be the Next Big Thing, and to be honest it has a lot going for it. <a href='http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/10/15/wewatchinmotion-flashforward/'>... want to read more?</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><div class="mceTemp" style="text-align: justify;">
<dl id="attachment_172" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 345px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://italkintype.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/flashforward-promo00.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-172 " style="margin-left: 7px; margin-right: 3px;" title="Flashforward cast" src="http://italkintype.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/flashforward-promo00.jpg" alt="The cast of 'Flashforward'. From ABC." width="335" height="217" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">The cast of &#8216;Flashforward&#8217; (Image: ABC)</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;">It’s the next <em>Lost</em>! It’s <em>Lost</em> but different – so if you like it’ll you’ll love it. It’s got Charlie in it! It has Penny in it! Mystery! Sci-Fi! A big catastrophe at the start! <em>Lost</em>! <em>Lost</em>!<em> Lost</em>!<em> Lost</em>!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&#8230;Yes, I’m pretty sure that the general gist of <strong><em>Flashforward</em></strong> is that it’s touted out to be the <strong>N</strong>ext <strong>B</strong>ig <strong>T</strong>hing, and to be honest it has a lot going for it. Massive hype and promotion, it has a decent budget and a cast of some recognisable names. For those who haven’t the foggiest what I’m saying, it stars Joseph Fiennes as an FBI agent who investigates a strange occurrence when the entire world blacks out for over two minutes. During these two minutes everyone experiences life six months in the future – and Fiennes goes to find out why it occurred. Meanwhile secondary characters end up experiencing different sides to the event. From a guy who sees his dead daughter, to another who sees nothing at all – to the guy who was on the bog the whole time.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-171"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">On paper, the idea sounds brilliant with the potential to explore the ideals of fate and destiny (a theme I extremely find interesting) and whether things can be changed. On screen&#8230;the execution leaves a little to be desired. There’s plenty to praise about here, but just like many major dramas there’s plenty to dissect and be concerned about.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Much of the performances are okay. It does beg question why two American characters are played by Brits (Sonja Wager plays Fiennes’ wife) as well as Jack Davenport and Dominic Mononononongahahahahan appearing later on. It’s good to see Davenport finally get a decent role in proceedings, even though he’s only really in episode two so far. Some aren’t so caught on from the start, with John Cho’s Bauer-With-A-Russian-Name not really coming across the scary bad-ass face that Kiefer sutherland uses to get free Twinkies at gas stations. It’s a shame as his story through the first three episodes is one of the more interesting (bar the ongoing story).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But in terms of the actual story&#8230;the first half of the pilot is immense, quite amazing in the impact-way. The world going to shiznit as people have blacked out&#8230;then people go a little sedate. A few shots of capitals in ruins later but there’s no really sense that the earth has had a huge crushing blow and everyone seems not too-panicky. I think perhaps the amount of characters it’s deciding to focus on cuts into it’s pacing, and thus it doesn’t allow for it to hook you. It feels confused, and thus makes some of it less engaging. Episode three, <em>127 Sekunden</em> contained the world’s most boring A-plot in it’s attempt to string out a moral dilemma for information that predictably wouldn’t be much – yet loosely led to a revelation in which the impact was lessened due to the nature of which it was found out.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">It needs that hook. It needs that moment in which it’s storylines begin to make sense. Or for the characters to suddenly grow into their own. Because there’s nothing to <em>love</em> about it. There’s plenty to like, but not enough to actually <em>love</em>. It’s yet to find it’s strengths, but surely the writers would’ve been able to get a better handle of what it wants to be from the get go.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Hopefully it knows what it’s doing. Hopefully I’m wrong and that the scope of the series means that everything is more laid out like setting up plot points in a novel. But a good prologue leading to some dragging opening chapters do not give a good impression.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So <strong><em>Flashforward</em></strong> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">can</span> be recommended – but mainly due to faith that it’ll grow into the series worthy of the hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/10/15/wewatchinmotion-flashforward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Should Watch Freaks and Geeks</title>
		<link>http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/05/23/why-you-should-watch-freaks-and-geeks/</link>
		<comments>http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/05/23/why-you-should-watch-freaks-and-geeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WeWatchOnTelevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james franco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judd apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us drama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://italkintype.co.uk/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>You see a TV show set in High School, and you’ll be forgiven to think that its core audience is people who are actually in high school. But what if the show is set in the early eighties, twenty years before the current generation? Could it actually be possible for a show to actually be aimed towards adults?
Well, with Freaks and Geeks, there might just be one. Its core focus is the struggles and life <a href='http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/05/23/why-you-should-watch-freaks-and-geeks/'>... want to read more?</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p>You see a TV show set in High School, and you’ll be forgiven to think that its core audience is people who are actually <span style="text-decoration: underline;">in</span> high school. But what if the show is set in the early eighties, twenty years before the current generation? Could it actually be possible for a show to actually be aimed towards adults?<span id="more-6"></span></p>
<p>Well, with <strong>Freaks and Geeks</strong>, there might just be one. Its core focus is the struggles and life of the outcasts of social society in the early eighties with kids who actually feel like High School students. Now it might be a locality thing (since I’m from Ol’ Blighty) but there’s a certain limit of shows about teenagers with rich parents doing several things at once in which the latest new show ends up coming across as completely unoriginal. This is what happened with <strong>90210</strong> – where it feels like <strong>The OC</strong> and <strong>Gossip Girl</strong> has done it all before. Even the original <strong>Beverley Hills</strong> predated it. <strong>My So-Called Life</strong> apparently is slightly more realistic but I’ve yet to watch that yet. <strong>Freaks and Geeks</strong> seems to paint a more realistic picture of high school that I’ve only really seen briefly in <strong>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</strong> and <strong>Veronica Mars</strong> before you deduct the genre quota of those shows. What’s interesting is that this was the 1999-2000 season before <strong>90210</strong> and its ilk, but running the same time as <strong>Dawson’s Creek </strong>and <strong>Popular</strong>. Though the former was a huge showcase of contrived bad acting and melodramatic unrealism the latter was a tongue-in-cheek jab at teen shows; watching this now after the modern wave just feels like a breath of fresh air.</p>
<p>There are no rich parents, no major dance or events the kids have to organise, no flights of fancy or anything of that ilk, it’s just kids and problems. There are no strong serialised stories that run through the series, mainly weak characters living through weekly A and B stories which focus on the brother/sister team of Lindsey and Sam Weir. Lindsey (Linda Cardellini, <strong>ER</strong> and <strong>Scooby Doo</strong>) is a 17-year old girl former Mathlete who decides to hang around with ‘freaks’ Daniel (James Franco, <strong>Spider-Man</strong> and <strong>Pineapple Express</strong>), Kim (Busy Phillips) and Nick (Jason Siegel, <strong>How I Met Your Mother</strong>). While 14-year old Sam (John Francis Daley, <strong>Waiting</strong> and <strong>Bones</strong>) has to deal with bullies and being picked last for sports with his friends Neil (Sam Levinne) and Bill Havershuck (Martin Starr). Other characters include the Weir parents and some teachers who do try and steal the screen time, and would succeed if it wasn’t for younger cast.</p>
<p>The two main characters end up central for the two plots that are linked thematically in each episode and sometimes converge, but never fully follow on to the next episode except for some occasions. The episodes don’t have any major messages or morals that run at the end, and there is a (thankful) lack of overblown melodrama and maturity in the story telling which further acts as evidence that it’s not fully aimed towards teenagers. But amongst all the realistic and down-to-earth characters that litter the show, it just feels easier to relate to what’s going on instead of ridiculous high-lifers.</p>
<p>In terms of episodes, there are no real stand-outs because they <span style="text-decoration: underline;">all</span> stand out. There are no real clunkers of ideas (mainly because there are only eighteen episodes) and episodes all feel strong and relate to the characters. The geeks usually steal the episodes though, with some highlights being Sam and co’s struggles against showering after gym and being picked last for baseball. There’s usually always something brilliant in every episode.</p>
<p>No. The real stand out here which brings out the iconic status the show has is the characters. Sam has been noted in some American magazine as being the idea TV son, but the stand-out for the geeks is Bill. The lanky stereotypical geek is immediately lovable, gets sympathy instantly and as the series unfolds and you start to get to know him and it’s just easy to get involved with the characters. The episode where he finds his gym teacher is dating his mother is probably the highlight, managing to get a tragic yet funny character to life even more. Of the freaks Daniel’s rebel-without-a-path strikes out, mainly because you can tell that James Franco is just having fun with what he gets to do at times. Where it’s manipulating adults, attempting to be a rocker; his character is another iconic image you won’t get to shake.</p>
<p>By the time you get to the end of series – you realise that you’ve gotten to know these characters, and then it hits you that there’s nothing left. With many shows you get a tinge of sadness – but with characters as fleshed out and likable as this – you are suddenly losing several friends. Maybe the show is regarded the way it is over the pond because of its short run and the show never got a chance to get stale. But you can’t help but wonder to see how Lindsey and Sam and their friends would develop, and how they would finish high school. Then again, would the show have lost something if the freaks graduated and got jobs while Lindsey went to college? We would never know…</p>
<p>It’s fun to see some actors and actresses that have moved on to other things nearly nine/ten years ago though. Shia Labeouf appears as a mascot, Ben Stiller a secret service agent, Lizzy Caplan as a disco dancer, Samaire Armstrong as a Grateful Dead fan, <strong>Privileged’s</strong> Joanna Garcia as a cheerleader as well as the main cast. Daley is now in <strong>Bones</strong>; Cardellini in <strong>ER</strong>, Seth Rogan goes from being Seth Rogan to being Seth Rogan later on and Jason Siegel in <strong>How I Met Your Mother</strong>.</p>
<p>It hasn’t got a Region 2 release (yet) but it’s something that should be experienced. If you ever get the chance to watch this, do it. You’ll not be disappointed.</p>
<p>Also posted on: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> &#8211; <a title="Why You Need To Watch " href="http://www.articlesbase.com/television-articles/why-you-need-to-watch-freaks-and-geeks-914563.html">Why You Need To Watch &#8220;Freaks and Geeks&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://italkintype.co.uk/2009/05/23/why-you-should-watch-freaks-and-geeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
